the AI is so fu*king terrible.) The story isn't consistent with the Black Ops trilogy (i.e., BO1, BOCW and BO2). A sequel of an awesome game should be innovative and iterative in order to get back the fans who loved the game in the first place. But it feels like the game wanted to do it intentionally so as to earn good reviews about its innovations, something the og cod fans have seen in Black Ops II. Surprisingly, the game wants to be non linear. Part of it is due to the toxic community. The game, once again has Russians as the villain. The location are pretty good, but doesn't honor the coolness and the stage set by its prequel. The campaign is, for the most part, feels like Cold War, but doesn't feel like Black Ops. Totally disrespecting the character from the prequel. James C Burns could have sparked the character of Woods. Frank Woods' was total **** He speaks as if he had just learnt how to swear. Russell Adler could have been a bad ass, if he had less lines to speak, something like the Noble team from Halo Reach. This game absolutely disrespects the way Black Ops 1 set the story. This isn't an innovative name like its prequel. Frank Woods' was total **** He speaks as if he had just learnt The game title speaks for itself Call Of Duty Black Ops Cold War. The game title speaks for itself Call Of Duty Black Ops Cold War.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |